Places of the Passion: A Place of God's Will
Wednesday, March 31, 2004
Rev. Ronald Burcham
Typed from audio transcript
Does it strike you as unusual in any way for Luke to
be recording the trial in this way? It would be easy
enough to understand if it kind of slipped by you. We
live in a day and age that, every time you turn on the
television set, you flip over to Fox News or to CNN
or even the local stations and we usually have some
high-profile case that's being sort of played in front
of us and being reported to us. But usually, when a
trial is presented to us that way, the facts of the
trial really are not the point. The reporters usually
are trying to drum up some intrigue and create some
drama so it captures your attention. You'll keep watching
the trial as it goes on. They're more interested in
finding out about the personality of the witnesses or
maybe some behind-the scenes dealing that's going on.
They might even bring experts to start discussing, "Now,
what tactic do you think the lawyers will try in this
next proceeding here?" Or "Do you think maybe
the judge has a bias?" It's all about drama and
intrigue, and there's not a whole lot said about the
facts of the trial.
Maybe that helps explain why this seems normal to us,
the way Luke records the trials of Jesus. But, in reality,
it's somewhat strange. It's very much out of character
for Luke to report it in this way. If you remember the
first chapter of Luke, he started out by saying that
he had set out to make a careful investigation, talking
to as many eyewitnesses as he could so he could do what?
So he could give an orderly account of the life of Jesus.
And that's what Luke is about. Luke is about historic
accuracy about the life of Jesus. He chronologically
goes through Jesus' life, giving us reference points
in history along the way; but Luke sticks to the facts.
He's a historian.
But you look at the way he describes the trial for
us here. There are very few facts, but there is lots
of intrigue. There's lots of drama. He gives us a behind-the-scenes
look at things. That's very different for scripture.
Scripture usually sticks to the facts. Look how Luke
described for us the denial of Peter. He simply states
that three times Peter was questioned and three times
Peter answered. He doesn't tell us what's going on in
Peter's mind. He doesn't tell us what's happening with
Peter's heart. He's silent about all of that. Yet we
come to the trials of Jesus, and he feels compelled
to us little details, little tidbits. Pilate and Herod,
they used to be enemies. On that day, they became friends.
Herod wanted to see Jesus because he wanted to see if
He could perform a trick for him, a miracle in his presence.
Then Pilate-he reveals to us that Pilate really wanted
to release Jesus and so now, all of a sudden, we sympathize
with Pilate as he comes back to the people three times
trying to convince them not to convict Jesus. There's
lots of drama. There's lots of intrigue. We come to
Luke expecting the facts about the trial. Instead, he
presents to us the facts about a fallen world. We come
expecting that Luke is going to lay out all the evidence
of why Jesus is innocent, but Jesus' innocence is self
evident. Even Pilate admits that. You see, tonight we
think we've come to a trial, a place in which Pontius
Pilate sits upon his chair and passes judgment; but
that's not what we've come to tonight at all. Luke summarizes
it for us in the very last sentence. He says of Pontius
Pilate, "And he released Jesus to their will."
Tonight is about the will of mankind, and it was the
will of mankind that Jesus should die. But it's also
about the will of God. We see in the trials before us
the divided will, the oftentimes-changing will of humanity.
The will of human beings is often changing. It's in
conflict oftentimes, and it's divided even against each
other. We see that in the surroundings about the trial.
We have a crowd gathered out there of spectators. Now,
among that crowd, certainly were people at one time
that were sitting at the feet of Jesus soaking in all
of His teaching and amazed at the things He said. Now
they're amazed that Pontius Pilate won't crucify Him,
and so they call out for blood. The religious leaders,
chief priests, teachers of the law, ones that were the
most outspoken about Roman rule and how we needed to
get rid of the Romans and rule ourselves and yet they
stand before Pilate appealing to Rome to take care of
their problem with Jesus. These are the ones who accuse
Jesus of perverting the nation and subverting it and
causing an uprising and yet, they demand that Barabbas
would be released to them, one who has been convicted
of insurrection and murder. The religious leaders who
are supposed to stand for God and yet they're calling
for the death of His Son.
Or Herod? Herod, who wants to see Jesus, you might
say he's an admirer of Jesus. He's been following Him
around, hearing all kinds of stories about Him; but
when he comes into the presence of Him, all he can do
is ridicule Him and mock Him. Now his Savior becomes
his enemy, and Pilate becomes his friend.
And what of Pilate? Pilate is probably the most conflicted
character in the whole scene. Pilate knows none of the
Jewish tradition. Pilate knows nothing of a promise
of a Messiah and a Jewish king. All that Pilate knows
is that he wants to keep order in his city. He's not
in Jerusalem because he wants to be there. He has traveled
to Jerusalem because he has to be there. He knows the
Passover brings in all kinds of people, and he wants
to maintain order. And what does he have on his hands?
All the makings of a riot. He has a crowd that's getting
larger by the moment and getting more violent by the
second. He has, standing next to him, a perfectly innocent
man and he knows it. There's part of him that wants
to release Jesus and not buy into all the false accusations.
Then there's the other part that looks at the ever-growing
crowd, and he wants to avoid a riot. He knows what's
the right thing to do, but he does the opposite.
This is a place of the human will, the human will which
is often changing, many times in conflict with itself
and divided. And even our human will today is the same.
Even those of us who call ourselves followers of Jesus,
who consider ourselves faithful to him, how often is
our will conflicted, divided against each other? We
want to be honest in everything we do. We want to have
integrity in our life. But tomorrow morning you get
to school and you don't have that English assignment
done and your best friend does, and she says, "Go
ahead and copy it." You sit down next week to do
your taxes. You had those couple of odd jobs last summer.
"Yeah, that's income but they didn't give me a
1099." You're in church on Sunday morning. You
make a commitment to God. You make a commitment to yourself.
You are going to control your anger. No longer are you
going to fly off the handle. You're going to take a
deep breath. You're going to count to ten. You're going
to pray to God. You're going to do whatever it takes
to control that anger. It will not control you any longer.
So after church, you go out to your car and you get
caught in the snarl up here on the west end, and pretty
soon you're banging the steering wheel and shouting
at the dashboard. You see, we know what's the right
thing to do but often times we don't do it. We know
what are the wrong things that we shouldn't do and yet
that's what we end up doing. It's that conflicted will
inside of us.
St. Paul talked about that in his letter to the church
at Rome. He described it much the same way. He says,
"The things I want to do, I don't do. The things
I don't want to do, that's what I end up doing."
And he says the same thing about five or six times,
so you can almost sense the frustration in the man of
this conflict that's going on inside of him, that he
knows what's the right thing to do, but he keep doing
the wrong thing. He tries to avoid the wrong thing,
and he does the wrong thing. And he finally concludes
by saying, "What a retched man I am. Who will save
me from this body of sin?" And then he answers
his own question. He says, "Thanks be to God through
Christ Jesus our Lord."
St. Paul brings us right back here. He brings us back
to this moment. This is a place of the human will, changing,
conflicted, divided. But this is also a place of God's
will. This is the moment when mankind's will and God's
will intersected. It was the will of humankind that
Jesus should die, and it was the will of the Father
that Jesus should die. Mankind thought, by killing Jesus,
they could sever the relationship with Him and be done
with Him and put Him behind them. God knew that, by
allowing Jesus to die, His relationship with mankind
would be restored and He would draw them closer to Him.
It was God's will that Jesus would be sentenced to death.
It was God's will that Pilate would wash his hands and
they would lead Him off and nail Him to a cross, because
it was God's will that all people would be saved. It
is God's will that all people would be forgiven, that
all people would come to faith in Him and know of His
salvation. And for God's will to be accomplished, He
knew that it was only through the death of His Son,
only through the shedding of His blood could forgiveness
be granted and new life be given. It was God's will
that Jesus would die, because it was God's will that
all people would be saved.
So God stepped into our world, our world of conflicted
and changing wills; and He shaped it and He formed it
to bring about His will. Where does that leave you and
I? What it says to us, in those moments when we're still
conflicted, those moments when the struggle is going
on inside of ourselves, we end up doing what we didn't
want to do, we end up not doing what we should have
done, we need to come right back here. St. Paul said,
"Thank God through Christ Jesus our Lord."
That was his salvation from his own will. The same is
true for us. When we are conflicted in our will, we
need to come back to God's will. And to remember what
God's will was, it was God's will that all people should
be saved even if that meant His Son must die. Amen.
Copyright 2004 Gloria Dei Lutheran Church
|